tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7699237061780229842.post991929358782183020..comments2009-08-06T23:27:12.929+08:00Jessehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13216179253923165798noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7699237061780229842.post-46350614219518765062009-08-06T23:27:12.929+08:002009-08-06T23:27:12.929+08:00That makes http://live.gnome.org/GnomeDeveloperKit/BuildingPackages slightly off now.<br /><br />I want to edit the source code of a package, but it is not in source/cache anymore. How does it work now?Pedrohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08776738868560266404noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7699237061780229842.post-43206482435804490792009-04-19T23:18:00.000+08:002009-04-19T23:18:00.000+08:00Yeah I am building from the master branch. Thanks for pointing out; I just thought 'master' didn't mean the head of development.<br /><br />But then neither does 'trunk' in subversion mean head...Anyway 'trunk' is straightforward, and we may continue with it.Zhanghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13216179253923165798noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7699237061780229842.post-72406743104198801512009-04-19T22:53:00.000+08:002009-04-19T22:53:00.000+08:00If you want something analogous to 'trunk' in git speak, it's not 'head' but 'master'.<br /><br />Even if you switch branches you're on the HEAD ref. If you're doing nightly build off the head of development... you're probably building off the 'master' branch.bartmanhttp://www.jukie.net/~bart/openid/noreply@blogger.com